Charities United Kingdom Health General Medical Council
GE

General Medical Council

Charity No 1089278 · Charity Commission Sign up to see website
Claim this charity
Ready to give?
100% goes to General Medical Council

GiveRadar doesn't take a cut. We couldn't find a direct donate page, so visit their site.

Visit www.gmc-uk.org
77
Integrity Assessment
Strong transparency
77/100 · methodology

About General Medical Council

We are an independent organisation that helps to protect patients and improve medical practice across the UK.

Founded
Size
very-large

Focus areas & reach

· What they work on and where
❤️ Health

How it stacks up against peers

· vs. 8 similar health in United Kingdom
Program spending This charity: 99%
Peer average: 97%
Integrity Assessment This charity: 77
Peer average: 89

Red flags

· All clear
Charity Commission removal
OFAC / EU / UN sanctions
Open investigations
Governance scandals
Related-party deals
Excessive exec comp

Where every £1 goes

£0.99
Program expenses£0.99 (£154.8 million)
99% to programs beats the peer average (97%) and beats the Charity Navigator "highly efficient" threshold (75%).

Common questions

· Auto-generated from filings + methodology

General Medical Council is a registered health nonprofit, United Kingdom. It is registered with the Charity Commission for England and Wales. It was founded in 2001 and has been operating for 25 years. It has a GiveRadar Integrity Assessment of 77/100 (Strong transparency), indicating well-documented governance, financials, and contact details. This is below the average of 89/100 for health charities in United Kingdom. The organization reports £168M in annual revenue. 12 officers and directors are publicly disclosed. No red flags have been detected. The charity has 72 community reviews with an average rating of 1.0/5. On Trustpilot, it has a rating of 1.2/5 based on 77 reviews.

General Medical Council has a GiveRadar Integrity Assessment of 77/100. This score combines five components: Registration (20 pts), Financial Transparency (30 pts), Governance (20 pts), Contact Availability (10 pts), and Data Recency (20 pts), with negative adjustments for any red flags. A score of 77 ('Strong transparency') reflects well-documented governance, recent financials, named leadership, and working contact details. The charity allocates 99% of expenses to programs, which contributes positively to its score. For comparison, the average integrity assessment for health charities in United Kingdom is 89/100.

General Medical Council is registered in United Kingdom. The organization was established in 2001 and has been active for 25 years.

Based on official tax filings, General Medical Council has £168M in annual revenue. It allocates 99% of expenses to programs and services. This is in line with the average of 97% for health charities in United Kingdom. Its revenue is significantly above the peer average of £1M. Create a free GiveRadar account to view the complete financial breakdown with year-over-year trends.

General Medical Council is classified as a Health organization, registered in United Kingdom. By size, it is categorized as a very-large organization. It has £168M in annual revenue. The organization has 12 disclosed officers and directors.

No red flags have been detected for General Medical Council. GiveRadar automatically screens charities for concerning patterns including high executive compensation, low program spending, and missing financial filings. Based on available official data, no issues have been identified.

General Medical Council has a GiveRadar Integrity Assessment of 77/100 (Strong transparency) and no red flags have been detected, which suggests it is a well-documented organization. It is regulated by the Charity Commission. 99% of expenses go to programs. The peer average is 97%. Note: the organization has a low Trustpilot rating of 1.2/5, which may reflect donor dissatisfaction. Visit the General Medical Council profile on GiveRadar for full details before deciding. GiveRadar provides data for research purposes and does not endorse any organization. Always do your own due diligence.

We are an independent organisation that helps to protect patients and improve medical practice across the UK. General Medical Council is classified as a health organization registered in United Kingdom. The organization was founded in 2001.

Among health charities registered in United Kingdom: General Medical Council's GiveRadar Integrity Assessment of 77/100 is below the peer average of 89/100. It allocates 99% of expenses to programs, in line with the peer average of 97%. Its annual revenue of £168M is well above the peer average of £1M.

General Medical Council is a registered charity in the United Kingdom. If you are a UK taxpayer, your donation may qualify for Gift Aid, which allows the charity to claim an extra 25p for every 1 pound you donate at no cost to you. Higher-rate and additional-rate taxpayers can also claim additional relief on their Self Assessment tax return.

Verified against 6 official sources, last refreshed .

Annual revenue
£100M-£1B
99% to programs
Source: Charity Commission (UK) (FY2024) why this matters
Unlock exact figures

Filing history

5 years on file from Charity Commission (UK) (FY2024): revenue, expenses, program spending, assets, and liabilities by fiscal year.

Years on record: FY2024, FY2023, FY2022, FY2021, FY2020.
Financial details are free - with a GiveRadar account

See 5 years of revenue, expense breakdowns, and balance sheet.

Sign up to view
Already have an account? Log in
No credit card · Takes 20 seconds

Taxes

Tax-deductibility for donors

UK donations qualify for Gift Aid. GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL is registered with the Charity Commission. Eligible UK taxpayers can boost their gift by 25% at no extra cost.

Always confirm tax treatment with the charity directly or your tax advisor before donating.

Leadership

DR
Dr Alison Wright
Trustee

Officers & trustees (12)

Source: Public filings

DR
Dr A••••• W•••••
Trustee
DR
Dr O•••••• O••••••••••
Trustee
DR
Dr R••••• P••••
Trustee
DR
Dr R•••• C•••••••••• W•••••••••
Trustee
DR
Dr V•••••• D•••••
Trustee
JA
Jane R•••••
Trustee
JO
John D•••••• M•••••••
Trustee
PR
Professor C••••••• M••••••
Trustee
PR
Professor D•••• M••••••••
Trustee
PR
Professor K•••• L••••
Trustee
SU
Suzanne S••••
Trustee
WE
Wendy W•••••••
Trustee
Full names, contact details & compensation

Free with an account.

Unlock

Latest news

From global news sources

10 articles found

From global news sources

Sentiment

Neutral

Activity timeline

Filings and press mentions, merged

Regulators sign up to new anti-racism principles - Management In Practice
May 2026
managementinpractice.com
Rapist doctor who kept licence struck off on appeal - BBC
May 2026
www.bbc.co.uk
Rural Emergency Physician Vicki Robertson Awarded Prestigious General Medical Council Credential - nhshighland.scot.nhs.
May 2026
www.nhshighland.scot.nhs.uk
GMC considering dozens of maternity care-related cases at trust - Doctors.net.uk
May 2026
www.doctors.net.uk
Doctors regulator reviewing 62 maternity cases - BBC
May 2026
www.bbc.com
Consultation on the draft General Medical Council Order 2026 - NHS Employers
Mar 2026
www.nhsemployers.org
Mann recommendations agreed in consultation on GMC overhaul - GOV.UK
Mar 2026
www.gov.uk
UK medical council overhaul may mean more doctors struck off for racism and antisemitism - The Guardian
Mar 2026
www.theguardian.com
General Medical Council appeals decision clearing Professor Ghassan Abu-Sittah - Bindmans
Mar 2026
www.bindmans.com
R (British Medical Association) v General Medical Council - blackstonechambers.com
Feb 2026
www.blackstonechambers.com
Form filed
£167.5M revenue
FY2024
CCEW
Form filed
£150.5M revenue
FY2023
CCEW
Form filed
£135.2M revenue
FY2022
CCEW
Form filed
£122.3M revenue
FY2021
CCEW
Form filed
£109.9M revenue
FY2020
CCEW

Donor reviews (72)

1.0 / 5 average · includes imported Trustpilot

1.0
72 reviews
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
72
Travesty

The General Medical Council should change it's motto to "working for doctors against patients." They themselves are, rather ironically, highly unethical according to my experience.

Mark Donor · Mar 26, 2026 Trustpilot Trustpilot
Malpractice

I cannot conceive how people are allowed to state they are GMC registered 'doctor's'when there's no record of them on the GMC records online. The dvla have no professional medical staff working in their department but only employed to wreck peoples working lives and others that state they're GMC registered qualified doctors on their 'honorary state medical team' who are recruited via facebook completing only what can be described as a pub quiz. It's time the Department of Transport and the GMC check all records to stop these unqualified 'doctors' making up peoples non existent health issues, overruling and wasting time of genuine GMC registered qualified hard working Doctor's and Medical Professionals. Unqualified people stating they're 'doctor's' can kill and need to be stopped from this malpractice.

Carol Oliver Donor · Mar 26, 2026 Trustpilot Trustpilot
They seem to side with the registered…

They seem to side with the registered doctor with no consideration given to that of the complainant; a 'professional' can do/say what they like.I don't understand why they publish guidelines by which these people should practice.

MR A Donor · Mar 26, 2026 Trustpilot Trustpilot
DON'T HAVE YOUR HEART BROKEN BY THE GMC...

The answer is in the question - who regulates the GMC? ANSWER- Themselves! It is run by Doctors who cannot 'Doctor' and so do admin on a quest to break the vulnerable patients and support the Dr Shipman's of this world. They claim to work to ethics when it suits and then break them again when it suits. Anything which suits them at their next coffee break is your answer to your heartbreaking complaint and concerns for your health and others. How do they sleep at night? I guess they count their gold coins under the bed gained from unscrupulous work....

BARBARA Donor · Mar 26, 2026 Trustpilot Trustpilot
No action will be taken

Staff were mostly courteous over the phone and also in person so I have given one star. However, with regards to systems, processes and accountability, the GMC appear unable or unwilling to help patients and their families. Even when their investigation is concluded and a GP has been found, by their own experts, to deliver care below the expected standard, nothing is done to address the problem. Nothing. GMC purport to not have the powers or authority to do anything regardless of outcome so what is the point of their existence? All we wanted was an apology from the GP. People make mistakes - even huge life or death ones. The GP in question didn't even comment on the final report. Arrogance. Whereas at least the GPs fellow colleagues had the courtesy to offer what could be very loosely construed as an apology to a grieving family in shock. It appears that GPs found to be delivering poor care are beyond reproach and the GPs know it. We provided a list of witnesses and not one was contacted to help confirm or contest the complaint. GMC experts were the only people contacted. The investigation itself took a year. This is a long, drawn out process, quite possibly to limit and deter any potential escalation to the Public Health Service Ombudsman (equally as useless). Should the PHSO go through the motions of reviewing a GMC complaint, they will ultimately say the complaint is outside of their timeline and so no further action can be taken. It feels like the GMC, PHSO, CQC, Healthwatch and Health Education England are all covering each other's weaknesses. GMC impartiality is highly questionable and it seems that no action taken is 100% guaranteed. NHS England, were on the other hand, far more proactive and open to addressing mistakes and actioning improvements.

Joanne Cammish Donor · Mar 26, 2026 Trustpilot Trustpilot
bug in the system

bug in the system, impossible to register

Pierre-Alain Chn Donor · Mar 26, 2026 Trustpilot Trustpilot
Wrote to these jokers regarding my care…

Wrote to these jokers regarding my care and the shocking treatment a doctor gave me, and guess what they said he had done nothing wrong 😂 What a corrupt organisation just like this government corruption through and through

Macca Donor · Mar 26, 2026 Trustpilot Trustpilot
As a doctor I have to say the GMC is a…

As a doctor I have to say the GMC is a completely fraudulent and racist institution.No actual value offered to patients and medical personnel. We pay annual fees to fund the operation and if you dont you can not practice. So many lives and careers destroyed Extortion operation should be investigated and closed down

Haras Dousn Donor · Mar 26, 2026 Trustpilot Trustpilot
NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE

I’ve written SEVERAL times with my allegations of malpractice from my medical centre who withheld my medication and have victimised me.Have written to their London, Manchester and Edinburgh addresses. THEY IGNORED ALL LETTERS. People online say they ALSO ignore emails.Why do they exist if they serve ZERO purpose? If the government fund them, it’s time the government removed their funding and install ANOTHER body to help us.ZERO STARS

J PP Donor · Mar 26, 2026 Trustpilot Trustpilot
GMC enables abuse

These do not appear to be issues we can assist you with’ is what thes GMC wrote when I sent 32 pages of proof of discrimination and medical gaslighting.A Sheffield surgeon ended my care with the whole Dept when I got a 2nd opinion which the GMC says you can do (no. 16e) AND this was after a complication after surgery.I sent a letter, date 14.11.18 from Mr Chapple before he knew about the 2nd opinion which said‘Mr Chapple or another clinician would be more than happy to find a solution to your problems',I sent email from his secretary 20.1.20 which said she was going to contact the surgeon I’d got a 2nd opinion from and I sent the letter I received from Mr Chapple on 20.3.20 after his secretary had contacted this surgeon which said‘It was agreed there were no further surgical treatment the colorectal department could offer you. It was also discussed that the therapeutic relationship that exists between yourself and the surgical specialists involved in your care had completely broken down’The GMC says Dr’s must ‘never discriminate unfairly against patients’. Also they have rules when a Dr can end a r.ship (abuse, theft) and what he must do (warn patient first) but this surgeon didn’t follow ANY of the rules and I evidenced it.I also sent a 11 page letter about medical gaslighting from this Dr + proof e.g. a letter from Mr Chapple 21.9.18 said‘I arranged for repeat ano-rectal manometry which was performed on 23.7.18. This shows reduced pressures compared to the previous manometry’A letter on 29.4.19 said ‘she has a number of psychological issues which are influencing the perception of the severity of her symptoms’I couldn’t understand how he could see my symptoms had gone worse and say the problem was psychological but I now know it’s medical gaslighting, it’s dismissing the facts and lying that the patient has psychological problems and using that to not help the targeted patient and it is a form of emotional abuse and caused me A LOT of distress.I sent the GMC 5 let

Tango Donor · Mar 26, 2026 Trustpilot Trustpilot

Have you donated or volunteered here?

Share your experience - it takes 30 seconds. Verified reviews help other donors decide.

Sign up to write a review

Peer charities

Other health in United Kingdom, by integrity assessment

Charity Score Revenue Program %
General Medical Council This page 77 £167.5 million 99%
Compassion in Action 89 £800,706 100%
West Sussex Mind 89 £3.6 million 96%
Worcestershire Association of Carers 89 £1.5 million 93%
Helpforce Community 89 £1.6 million 96%
Headway Birmingham & Solihull 89 £2.2 million 93%
Emmaus Bristol 89 £788,306 98%
The Peaceful Place Ltd 89 £748,485 98%
Hoxton Hall 89 £825,165 100%

Sources and verification

Refreshed

Registration and legal identity
Charity Commission for England and Wales - Register of Charities
Financial filings
Charity Commission annual returns - Fiscal year 2024 most recent on file.
Officers and trustees
Charity Commission for England and Wales - Register of Charities - 12 disclosed in the public registry.
News and media coverage
GDELT Project + Google News
Donor reviews (external)
Trustpilot consumer reviews
Community reviews (verified email)
GiveRadar Community Reviews - 72 verified review(s) on file.

Data freshness

Last updated
Mar 5, 2026
Profile completeness
85%

What we don't know

Honest gaps - our score reflects transparency, not impact

Executive compensation
Top-officer pay not disclosed
Mission statement
No self-published statement of purpose
Programs & projects
No named programs listed by the charity
Headquarters address
No street address on file
Operating reach
Countries where programs run not specified
Programmatic detail
Specific cause areas not yet tagged

Methodology

GiveRadar combines public registry filings, ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer, Charity Navigator, GuideStar, and news archives into a single 0-100 integrity assessment. We don't take a cut of any donation, ever.

Read full methodology

Quick facts about General Medical Council

What is General Medical Council?
General Medical Council is a health nonprofit organization, United Kingdom. We are an independent organisation that helps to protect patients and improve medical practice across the UK.
When was General Medical Council founded?
General Medical Council was founded in 2001.
Where is General Medical Council located?
Headquartered in United Kingdom.
What is General Medical Council's annual budget?
Annual revenue for fiscal year 2024 is approximately £100M-£1B. 99% of expenses go to program services.
Is General Medical Council trustworthy?
General Medical Council has a GiveRadar Integrity Assessment of 77 out of 100 (Strong transparency). The score reflects public-data transparency: registration, financial disclosure, governance, contact details, and how recently data was refreshed. It does not measure program impact.
What is General Medical Council's website?
https://www.gmc-uk.org
Are donations to General Medical Council tax-deductible?
Donations may be tax-deductible for residents of United Kingdom under local rules. US donors should check whether the charity has an equivalency-determination letter or a US-based fiscal sponsor before claiming a deduction.