Comparison
GiveRadar vs CAF America (Charities Aid Foundation of America): an honest comparison
Two complementary tools for institutional cross-border giving. CAF America is a US 501(c)(3) cross-border giving intermediary that handles Equivalency Determination and grant routing for foundations and corporations. GiveRadar is a free global research database. The two pair naturally: research on GiveRadar, route the grant through CAF America.
GiveRadar in one paragraph
A free global charity research database launched in 2026. Aggregates 7 million+ charities across 65+ countries from 50+ official government registries. Computes an Integrity Assessment from 0 to 100 from registry-filed data, plus automated red flags, sanctions screening, and news context. We do not process donations, do not handle Equivalency Determinations, and do not run Donor Advised Funds. Free public web interface, free API tier (100 req/day), Pro at 99 USD per month, transparent pricing.
CAF America in one paragraph
A US 501(c)(3) public charity (EIN 43-1634280) founded 1992 and the North American arm of the global Charities Aid Foundation network (parent UK CAF distributes over 1.4 billion USD annually). Facilitates cross-border charitable giving for institutional donors (foundations, corporations) and individuals through Donor Advised Funds, Equivalency Determination, Expenditure Responsibility, and grant management services. Vetted network of approximately 2 million charities across 135 countries. Fee-based services proportional to grantmaking volume; pricing not publicly disclosed.
The 30-second verdict
If you are a foundation, corporation, or institutional donor making cross-border grants and need US-tax-compliant routing through Equivalency Determination or Expenditure Responsibility, CAF America is the established choice and we cannot replace what they do. If you are doing the research step that comes before deciding which charity to fund (anywhere in the world), GiveRadar is a free public research layer with registry-sourced data, an Integrity Assessment, and red flag detection that CAF America's vetting process does not expose externally. Pair the two: GiveRadar for the research, CAF America for the cross-border legal and tax work.
Who they are
A bit of context on each platform before the side-by-side detail.
CAF America
Charities Aid Foundation of America was founded in 1992 as the North American arm of the global Charities Aid Foundation (CAF), itself a UK charity established in 1924. CAF America is a US 501(c)(3) public charity (EIN 43-1634280) headquartered in Alexandria, Virginia. The mission is to remove the legal and operational barriers to cross-border charitable giving for US donors.
CAF America's defining service is acting as a US-based intermediary for international grantmaking. When a US foundation, corporation, or donor wants to support a foreign nonprofit, CAF America performs the required compliance work (typically Equivalency Determination or Expenditure Responsibility), accepts the donation as a US tax-deductible contribution, and routes the funds to the foreign recipient. This solves the structural challenge that direct international grants from US 501(c)(3)s often require complex compliance lift to maintain favorable tax treatment.
Services include the CAF American Donor Fund (a transatlantic DAF for dual UK-US taxpayers), Donor Advised Funds, Legacy Giving, grant management, and advisory services. The vetted network covers approximately 2 million charitable organizations in 135 countries. CAF America is part of the broader CAF International Network, with sister organizations in Australia, Canada, India, and other jurisdictions. The combined network distributes more than 1.4 billion USD annually globally. Fees are proportional to volume and intensity of grantmaking; pricing is account-managed rather than publicly disclosed.
GiveRadar
GiveRadar launched in 2026 as a free global charity research database. We are not a giving intermediary, do not perform Equivalency Determinations, and do not run Donor Advised Funds. Our function is research: aggregating registry-filed data from 50+ official government regulators across 65+ countries into a unified, freely-accessible schema.
Every charity in the database receives an automatic Integrity Assessment from 0 to 100 calculated across registration status, financial transparency, organizational transparency, third-party validation, and community signals. We surface automated red flags (high executive pay, low program spending, missing filings, sanctions matches) and per-charity news context through GDELT integration.
For institutional donors using CAF America for cross-border grant routing, GiveRadar serves as an upstream research layer: identify and vet the prospective recipient using registry-sourced operational data, then engage CAF America to handle the legal, tax, and compliance work of the actual grant. The two systems are designed for different functions in the same workflow.
Side-by-side comparison
These tools serve different functions; the table compares them across dimensions where each is meaningful. Last reviewed June 2026.
| Dimension | GiveRadar | CAF America |
|---|---|---|
| Primary function | Free global charity research database | Cross-border giving intermediary for institutional donors |
| Geographic coverage | 65+ countries via official government registries | 135 countries via vetted nonprofit network |
| Records | 7 million+ charities (registry-sourced) | ~2 million vetted nonprofits |
| Equivalency Determination | No (research-only platform) | Yes; core service for US foundation grantmaking |
| Expenditure Responsibility | No | Yes; alternative compliance pathway when ED is impractical |
| Donor Advised Funds | No | Yes; CAF American Donor Fund and standard DAFs |
| Per-charity scoring | Integrity Assessment 0-100 (5 components, automated) | Internal vetting outcome (eligible or not); not publicly exposed as a score |
| Red flags / news context | Yes (auto red flags + GDELT news + Open Sanctions screening) | Compliance review per recipient; not exposed publicly |
| Public API | REST + OpenAPI spec; free 100 req/day; Pro 99 USD/month | No public API; account-managed client portals |
| Pricing transparency | Public, self-service; Pro 99 USD/month, Enterprise custom | Fees proportional to grantmaking volume; not publicly disclosed |
| Audience | Donors, journalists, researchers, grantmakers, developers | Foundations, corporations, high-net-worth donors with cross-border programs |
| Founded | 2026 | 1992 (parent CAF UK established 1924) |
| Legal status | Private platform (Timmermans Media OÜ, Estonia) | US 501(c)(3) public charity (EIN 43-1634280) |
| Network / parent | Independent | Part of CAF International Network (UK parent, plus Australia, Canada, India offices) |
When to use which
For institutional cross-border giving, the answer is usually "both, in sequence."
Use CAF America when
- • You are a US private foundation, corporation, or DAF account holder making grants to foreign charities
- • You need formal Equivalency Determination or Expenditure Responsibility to maintain US tax compliance on cross-border grants
- • You want intermediary infrastructure to handle currency conversion, foreign anti-corruption compliance, and grant reporting
- • You are a UK-US dual taxpayer interested in the CAF American Donor Fund's tax-efficient transatlantic giving structure
- • You have ongoing international grantmaking volume that justifies the fee-based service relationship
- • You value the CAF International Network's multi-country presence for grants in CAF-served jurisdictions
Use GiveRadar when
- • You are researching a prospective grant recipient before engaging CAF America (or any other intermediary)
- • You want registry-filed financial signals, governance data, and an Integrity Assessment alongside CAF America's vetting outcome
- • You want sanctions screening, news monitoring, or red flag detection per charity
- • You are a smaller foundation, journalist, academic, or individual donor without budget for CAF America's institutional services
- • You need a programmatic API for nonprofit research, scaled cross-country comparison, or integration into your own grantmaking workflow
- • Your research extends to charities outside CAF America's vetted network of ~2 million
The institutional grantmaker workflow
For a foundation officer planning a cross-border grant: start with GiveRadar to identify candidate organizations, surface their registry-filed financial signals, check for red flags and sanctions matches, and read recent news context. Once the candidate list is short, engage CAF America (or another ED specialist like NGOsource) to handle the formal Equivalency Determination, draft the grant agreement, route the disbursement, and manage post-grant reporting. Each tool stays in its lane and the overall process is faster, cheaper, and better-documented than either alone.
What we have in common
Both platforms are genuinely committed to making global giving safer and more effective.
Global mission
Both platforms exist to support international giving rather than focusing narrowly on a single country's nonprofit sector.
Verification layer
CAF America vets through Equivalency Determination and ongoing compliance review; GiveRadar verifies through official-registry presence. Different methods, same intent.
Cross-border focus
Both platforms recognize that nonprofit sectors and donor pools cross national lines, and both build infrastructure that respects that reality.
Public-good orientation
CAF America is itself a US 501(c)(3); GiveRadar keeps the donor-facing core product free. Neither extracts value from donor flows beyond stated service fees or commercial API tiers.
Honest about the limits
Where each platform is not the right tool. Both have meaningful gaps relative to the other.
Where CAF America is not a fit
- • Researching charities outside their vetted network of ~2 million, especially smaller or newer organizations they have not engaged
- • Self-service charity research without engaging a sales or services relationship
- • Programmatic queries on the broad nonprofit universe (no public API)
- • Smaller donors and small foundations whose grant volume does not justify CAF America's institutional fee structure
- • Per-charity numeric scoring, public red flag detection, or news context as accessible data
- • Independent journalism use cases requiring open access to underlying data
Where GiveRadar is not a fit
- • Performing Equivalency Determination or Expenditure Responsibility for US foundation cross-border grants
- • Operating Donor Advised Funds or accepting US tax-deductible donations on behalf of foreign charities
- • Routing payment in foreign currency to international grant recipients
- • Drafting grant agreements, anti-corruption compliance review, or post-grant reporting workflows
- • Account-managed advisory services for foundations building international grantmaking strategies
- • The honest caveat: institutional grantmakers conducting US tax-compliant cross-border giving need an intermediary like CAF America, NGOsource, or comparable; GiveRadar supplements but does not replace this layer
Research the world's charities
Search any of 7 million+ charities across 65+ countries, registry-sourced and free. Then engage your preferred cross-border giving intermediary with confidence in the underlying research.
Primary sources
- CAF America main site
- CAF America: How We Work
- CAF America: US Nonprofits
- CAF America: Foreign Nonprofits
- CAF America: Contribution Policies
- CAF America: Friends Of vs Friends Fund
- CAF America: Cross-Border Giving Book
- Charities Aid Foundation (UK parent)
- CAF America Foundation profile (GuideStar)
All figures sourced from each platform's own published documentation. GiveRadar figures are live counts from this platform.
This page is written and maintained by GiveRadar. We make no claim to neutrality: we built GiveRadar and we believe in it. We have tried to represent CAF America fairly. CAF America is the established choice for institutional cross-border charitable giving and we recommend it without reservation for foundations and corporations conducting international grantmaking. The two tools answer different questions and combine well; this page exists to clarify which question each one answers. If you spot an inaccuracy, email [email protected] and we will correct it.