Comparison
GiveRadar vs NGO Explorer: an honest comparison
Two free charity research tools, very different scopes. NGO Explorer is a specialized academic-funded tool surfacing England-and-Wales charities that work overseas, built on Charity Commission data through Charity Base. GiveRadar is a global research database covering 7 million+ charities across 65+ countries. They are complementary, not competitors.
GiveRadar in one paragraph
A free global charity research database launched in 2026. Aggregates 7 million+ charities across 65+ countries from 50+ official government registries (including the Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR for Scotland, CCNI for Northern Ireland, and 62 other national regulators). Computes an Integrity Assessment from 0 to 100 from registry data, plus automated red flags, sanctions screening, and per-charity news context. Free public web interface, free API tier (100 req/day), Pro at 99 USD/month, public OpenAPI spec.
NGO Explorer in one paragraph
A free specialized research tool at ngoexplorer.org surfacing England-and-Wales charities that work overseas, built by data scientist David Kane (formerly of NCVO) and Dan Kwiatkowski (creator of Charity Base). Sourced from Charity Commission data via Charity Base. Funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Global Challenges Research Fund, with academic partnership from the Universities of Sheffield and Manchester. Supported by Bond, the UK NGO development network. Designed for sector-internal research; deliberately excludes UK-only charities and non-UK regulators.
The 30-second verdict
If you specifically need to research UK-registered charities (England and Wales) doing international development work, NGO Explorer is purpose-built for exactly that question with thoughtful sector framing and Bond-affiliated curation. If your research includes Scottish or Northern Irish charities, charities registered in any of the other 65+-1 countries we cover, or you need an Integrity Assessment, red flag detection, sanctions screening, news context, or a programmatic API, GiveRadar is the broader option. For a UK development-sector report specifically, NGO Explorer's specialist lens is hard to beat. For comparative international research, GiveRadar adds the global scope.
Who they are
A bit of context on each platform before the side-by-side detail.
NGO Explorer
NGO Explorer is a specialized free research tool at ngoexplorer.org that surfaces England-and-Wales charities working overseas, with charities active only in the UK deliberately excluded from the dashboard. The project was developed by data scientist David Kane (formerly of NCVO, the National Council for Voluntary Organisations) in collaboration with Dan Kwiatkowski, who created Charity Base, the open-data project that makes Charity Commission data more accessible.
Funding came from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Global Challenges Research Fund, with institutional support from the Universities of Sheffield and Manchester. Bond, the United Kingdom membership body for NGOs in international development, supported the project and unveiled the tool to its members. Design decisions were informed by smaller UK development charities, particularly those based outside London, who wanted a way to find sector counterparts both in their region and in the overseas countries where they operate.
The tool's strength is its curated specialist lens: dashboards optimized for UK-NGO international development research, sector-relevant filters (size, activity area, overseas country of operation), and downloadable data outputs. It does not have a public API of its own, but the underlying Charity Base feed exposes the Charity Commission data programmatically.
GiveRadar
GiveRadar launched in 2026 as a free global charity research database. Where NGO Explorer focuses depth-first on the UK-overseas development sector, GiveRadar focuses breadth-first on the entire registered nonprofit sector globally. We ingest data from 50+ official government registries across 65+ countries, including the Charity Commission for England and Wales (the same source NGO Explorer uses, via Charity Base), OSCR for Scotland, CCNI for Northern Ireland, ACNC for Australia, the IRS for the United States, the CRA for Canada, BZSt for Germany, RNA for France, and dozens more.
Every charity in the database receives an Integrity Assessment from 0 to 100 calculated automatically across registration status, financial transparency, organizational transparency, third-party validation, and community signals. We surface automated red flags (high executive pay, low program spending, missing filings, sanctions matches) and per-charity news context through GDELT integration.
The platform is free for browsing and offers a free public REST API at 100 requests per day, scaling to 99 USD per month for Pro and custom Enterprise pricing. Methodology and OpenAPI specification are published openly under CC-BY 4.0. We are independent of any sector membership body and serve donors, researchers, journalists, grantmakers, and developers regardless of cause area or country focus.
Side-by-side comparison
Every comparison below is sourced from each platform's published documentation. Last reviewed June 2026.
| Dimension | GiveRadar | NGO Explorer |
|---|---|---|
| Geographic coverage | 65+ countries via official registries | England and Wales only (Charity Commission); overseas operations of those charities surfaced |
| Scope filter | All registered charities (no opt-in scope filter) | Only charities working overseas; UK-only charities deliberately excluded |
| Records | 7 million+ charities | A subset of England and Wales charities (Find that Charity reports 420,501 UK charities total; NGO Explorer surfaces the overseas-active subset) |
| Primary data source | 50+ official government registries (IRS, CCEW, CCNI, OSCR, ACNC, CRA, BZSt, RNA, etc.) | Charity Commission for England and Wales via Charity Base |
| Per-charity scoring | Integrity Assessment 0-100 (5 components, automated) | No score; presents data signals for users to interpret |
| Red flags / news context | Yes (auto red flags + GDELT news + Open Sanctions screening) | No |
| Public API | REST + OpenAPI spec; free 100 req/day; Pro 99 USD/month | No direct API; underlying Charity Base API is available separately |
| Pricing | Free web; free 100 req/day API; Pro 99 USD/month; transparent pricing | Fully free; academic-funded |
| Methodology published | Yes, openly under CC-BY 4.0 | Project background and data sourcing documented; sector-specific dashboards optimized for UK NGO use |
| Audience | Donors, journalists, researchers, grantmakers, developers (all sectors, all countries) | UK development-sector researchers, smaller UK NGOs looking for counterparts, sector policy bodies |
| Funding model | Pro and Enterprise API revenue sustains the free tier | ESRC and Global Challenges Research Fund grants; academic partnership |
| Founder / lead developer | Matt Timmermans | David Kane (data scientist, formerly NCVO) and Dan Kwiatkowski (Charity Base creator) |
| Sector affiliation | Independent platform; no sector membership body affiliation | Supported by Bond (UK NGO international development network) |
When to use which
Specialist tool versus general-purpose database. Both legitimate; different fit.
Use NGO Explorer when
- • Your research focuses specifically on England-and-Wales charities working overseas
- • You are inside the UK development sector and value Bond-affiliated framing
- • Curated dashboards with sector-relevant filters (overseas country of operation, activity area) match your research workflow
- • You are a smaller UK development charity looking for sector counterparts
- • Academic-rigor framing matters for your audience (UK research, policy work, sector reports)
- • You explicitly do not want UK-only charities cluttering your view
Use GiveRadar when
- • Your research includes Scottish charities (OSCR), Northern Irish charities (CCNI), or charities registered outside the UK
- • You want to compare UK NGOs to international peers under a unified schema
- • An Integrity Assessment, red flag detection, sanctions screening, or news context per charity matters to your research
- • You need a programmatic REST API for nonprofit research at scale
- • Your research includes UK-only charities (which NGO Explorer deliberately excludes)
- • You are outside the UK development sector and need a general-purpose research tool
Use both when
You are doing a UK NGO international development research project and want both specialist context and broader comparison. NGO Explorer's curated UK-overseas dashboards give you the sector view; GiveRadar's global database lets you contextualize the UK NGOs against international peers, surface news and sanctions signals, and access programmatic data export. The two tools rest on overlapping source data (the Charity Commission for England and Wales) but answer different questions in different framings.
What we have in common
Despite different scopes, both platforms share core principles about open charity data.
Free for users
Both platforms are fully free for browsing and research; no paywall on the donor-facing or researcher-facing core experience.
Charity Commission data
Both tools build on the same underlying Charity Commission for England and Wales register, so UK figures will agree by construction where the two overlap.
Open data orientation
Both platforms publish data sources transparently and support downstream research; we credit the Charity Base ecosystem for making UK regulator data accessible.
Public-good missions
NGO Explorer is academic-funded by ESRC and the Global Challenges Research Fund; GiveRadar is privately operated but commits to keeping the core product free. Both prioritize public benefit.
Honest about the limits
Where each platform is not the right tool. We try to call out our own weaknesses as plainly as we call out anyone else's.
Where NGO Explorer is not a fit
- • Charities registered outside England and Wales (Scotland, Northern Ireland, US, EU, Asia, etc.)
- • UK-only charities; the tool deliberately excludes domestic-focused organizations
- • Programmatic research at scale (no public API of its own)
- • Per-charity scoring, automated red flag detection, or sanctions screening
- • Per-charity news context for due diligence
- • General-purpose donor research outside the UK development sector
Where GiveRadar is not a fit
- • Curated dashboards specifically optimized for UK-NGO international development sector framing
- • Bond-affiliated context that matters to UK development-sector policy and research audiences
- • Academic-rigor framing of the kind ESRC-funded projects bring to sector reports
- • The honest caveat: for UK development-sector practitioners who want a tool built specifically for their use case, NGO Explorer's specialist focus is genuinely valuable in ways our broader scope cannot replicate
- • For the narrow query "which UK charities work in country X overseas?", NGO Explorer's filtered presentation is faster than navigating GiveRadar's broader interface
Research charities anywhere in the world
Search any of 7 million+ charities across 65+ countries, registry-sourced and free. Pair with NGO Explorer for UK-development-sector specialist research where its curation adds value.
Primary sources
- NGO Explorer main site
- University of Manchester: NGO Explorer announcement
- Global Development Institute Blog: Exploring the UK's NGO Sector
- Charity Base (Dan Kwiatkowski; underlying data feed)
- Find that Charity (David Kane; related project)
- Bond (UK NGO international development network)
- Bond (British Overseas NGOs for Development) on Wikipedia
- Charity Commission for England and Wales (root data source)
All figures sourced from each platform's own published documentation. GiveRadar figures are live counts from this platform.
This page is written and maintained by GiveRadar. We make no claim to neutrality: we built GiveRadar and we believe in it. We have tried to represent NGO Explorer fairly. NGO Explorer is a thoughtful sector-built tool that adds value through its specialized UK-development-sector framing, and we recommend it without reservation for that specific research need. The two platforms answer different questions; this page exists to clarify which question each one is best at. If you spot an inaccuracy, email [email protected] and we will correct it.