What is the difference between GiveRadar and NGOBase?

Different data sourcing and different audiences. NGOBase (ngobase.org) is a multi-purpose NGO ecosystem platform with approximately 252,000 nonprofit listings sourced primarily from user submissions and reviewed before being added; alongside the directory it offers a funding agencies and grants directory, a jobs board, events listings, and volunteer opportunities aimed at NGO sector professionals. GiveRadar covers 7 million+ charities across 65+ countries sourced from 50+ official government registries (IRS, Charity Commission, ACNC, CRA, BZSt, RNA, etc.) with an automatic Integrity Assessment from 0 to 100, automated red flag detection, sanctions screening, and per-charity news context. NGOBase wins on India and South Asia depth and on NGO-professional features (jobs, grants, events). GiveRadar wins on data verification, scale, geographic breadth, and per-charity research depth.

Is GiveRadar an NGOBase alternative?

For donor and journalist research, yes; for NGO-professional resources (grants discovery, jobs, events), less so. NGOBase serves NGO sector professionals looking for funding opportunities, job postings, and sector events alongside the directory. GiveRadar is research-focused and does not currently provide a grants discovery feed, jobs board, or events listings; we surface registry-filed charity data with operational signals. If you are researching whether a charity is legitimate, financially transparent, and well-governed, GiveRadar's registry-sourced approach is more rigorous than NGOBase's user-submitted directory. If you are an NGO professional discovering funding opportunities or sector jobs, NGOBase has features GiveRadar does not.

How many NGOs are on NGOBase versus GiveRadar?

NGOBase reports approximately 252,000 NGOs and charities listed across multiple countries, with strong representation in India, Pakistan, the United States, Australia, Canada, Malaysia, New Zealand, and Singapore. GiveRadar covers 7 million+ charities across 65+ countries (including all of NGOBase's covered countries plus 50+ others, sourced through the IRS, Charity Commissions, ACNC, CRA, NGO Darpan in India, and equivalent regulators in countries NGOBase does not cover deeply). The scale difference reflects the data-sourcing approach: NGOBase ingests and reviews user-submitted entries, while GiveRadar bulk-ingests every entry from official government registries automatically.

How does NGOBase verify the NGOs in its directory?

NGOBase accepts user submissions through a Suggest an NGO interface and reviews submissions before adding them to the database. The exact verification methodology and ongoing monitoring are not extensively documented publicly. GiveRadar's verification is registry-based: a charity is in our database because it appears in an official government charity registry (IRS Exempt Organizations Master File, Charity Commission for England and Wales, Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission, etc.). Where NGOBase has data NGOBase has verified through user submissions, GiveRadar has data the relevant national regulator has verified through formal registration. For charities with strong registry presence, both tools should agree; for charities only in NGOBase's user-submitted listings without official registration, GiveRadar may not include them.

Does NGOBase have an API?

NGOBase does not publicly publish an API or developer documentation as of mid-2026. Their value proposition is the web directory and ecosystem features (grants, jobs, events). GiveRadar publishes a public REST API with a free 100-request-per-day tier (self-service signup, no approval required), Pro at 99 USD per month for 10,000 daily requests, and a public OpenAPI specification. For developers building tools on top of nonprofit data, GiveRadar's API removes friction NGOBase's web-only model maintains.

Which has better India NGO coverage, NGOBase or GiveRadar?

NGOBase has historically focused strongly on India and South Asia, with substantial state-level breakdowns (Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, etc.) reflecting active local data work. GiveRadar covers India through the NGO Darpan registry maintained by NITI Aayog (Government of India). For comprehensive India NGO research, both tools have value: NGOBase has deeper sub-national breakdowns and user-contributed organizational detail; GiveRadar has the official NITI Aayog register entries with their formal registration metadata, plus our standard Integrity Assessment, red flag detection, and integration with global cross-country analysis. Serious India-focused research often benefits from both perspectives.

Should I trust NGOBase's data?

Within the limits of user-submitted directory verification, yes. NGOBase reviews submissions before adding entries and the platform is established. The honest caveat is that user-submitted data carries different reliability than registry-filed data: an NGO that appears on NGOBase has been added by someone (the organization itself, a volunteer, an editor) and reviewed, but has not necessarily been verified against an official government regulator the way GiveRadar's data is by definition. For research where source authority matters (grant due diligence, journalism, academic research, sanctions screening), prefer registry-sourced verification through GiveRadar; for general directory browsing or NGO discovery in NGOBase's strong-coverage regions, NGOBase is fine.

Does GiveRadar have a grants directory like NGOBase?

No. NGOBase publishes a Funding Agencies & Grantmakers Worldwide directory aimed at NGO sector professionals seeking funding opportunities. GiveRadar is currently focused on the recipient side (the charities themselves) rather than the funder side; we do not maintain a grants directory or grant alerts feed. For grants discovery, NGOBase, Candid (Foundation Directory), GrantStation, FundsforNGOs, and similar tools each cover different parts of the space. We may add funder-side coverage in the future but do not provide it today.

Can I cross-check NGOBase listings on GiveRadar?

Often yes. NGOBase entries that correspond to charities formally registered with their national regulator (IRS, CRA, ACNC, NGO Darpan in India, etc.) will typically also appear in GiveRadar with full registry-sourced detail, financials, Integrity Assessment, and red flag detection. NGOBase entries that are user-submitted but not formally registered may not appear in GiveRadar at all. The honest workflow for journalists or grantmakers using NGOBase as a discovery tool: cross-check any candidate NGO against GiveRadar to verify it is registered and to see registry-filed financial signals before relying on the NGOBase profile alone.

Yes, browsing the NGOBase directory and accessing the funding agencies, jobs, and events listings is free. The platform appears to be funded through advertising and sector partnerships rather than user fees. GiveRadar is similarly free for browsing and offers a free 100-request-per-day API tier with self-service signup; Pro and Enterprise paid tiers are available for higher programmatic volume. Both platforms keep the donor-facing and researcher-facing core product free.

Comparison

GiveRadar vs NGOBase: an honest comparison

Two free NGO research platforms with very different sourcing models. NGOBase (ngobase.org) is a user-submitted multi-purpose NGO ecosystem with about 252,000 listings, plus a funding agencies directory, jobs board, and events feed. GiveRadar is a registry-sourced research database with 7 million+ charities across 65+ countries and an automatic Integrity Assessment.

Skip to verdict See full comparison

GiveRadar in one paragraph

A free global charity research database launched in 2026. Aggregates 7 million+ charities across 65+ countries from 50+ official government registries (IRS, Charity Commission, ACNC, CRA, NGO Darpan, BZSt, RNA, and dozens more). Computes an Integrity Assessment from 0 to 100 from registry data, plus automated red flags, sanctions screening, and news context. Free public web interface, free API tier (100 req/day), Pro at 99 USD/month, transparent pricing, public OpenAPI spec. Research-only; we do not run a jobs board, grants directory, or events listings.

NGOBase in one paragraph

A free multi-purpose NGO ecosystem platform at ngobase.org with approximately 252,000 NGOs and charities listed across multiple countries (with strong India, Pakistan, United States, Australia, Canada, Malaysia, New Zealand, and Singapore coverage). Beyond the directory, NGOBase publishes a Funding Agencies and Grantmakers Worldwide directory, a jobs board, an events feed, and volunteer opportunity listings aimed at NGO sector professionals. Listings are sourced through user submissions reviewed before publication. Free for users; appears to be supported by advertising and sector partnerships.

The 30-second verdict

If you are an NGO professional looking for grants discovery, sector jobs, or events listings alongside a directory, NGOBase has features GiveRadar does not. If you are doing research on a specific charity (verifying legitimacy, checking financials, understanding governance, screening for sanctions, reviewing news context), GiveRadar's registry-sourced verification is more rigorous than NGOBase's user-submitted directory. For most cross-border research, GiveRadar's coverage of 65+ countries also significantly exceeds NGOBase's strong-coverage list of about 8 countries. Use both when researching India or South Asia where NGOBase's local depth complements our NGO Darpan-sourced view.

Who they are

A bit of context on each platform before the side-by-side detail.

NGOBase

NGOBase (ngobase.org) is a multi-purpose NGO ecosystem platform that combines a charity directory with sector-professional features. The mission, as published, is to bridge technology with social impact by offering tools and data-driven directories that strengthen the nonprofit sector.

The directory contains approximately 252,000 NGO and charity listings sourced through user submissions reviewed before being added to the database. Users can browse by country, state, city, and focus area. Coverage is strongest in India, Pakistan, the United States, Australia, Canada, Malaysia, New Zealand, and Singapore, with state-level and city-level breakdowns particularly developed for India.

Beyond the directory, NGOBase publishes a Funding Agencies and Grantmakers Worldwide directory for NGO professionals seeking grant opportunities, a jobs board for sector employment, an events feed, and volunteer opportunity listings. The platform appears to be supported by advertising and sector partnerships rather than user fees; it is free for users to browse and search.

GiveRadar

GiveRadar launched in 2026 as a free global charity research database. Where NGOBase combines directory features with NGO-professional ecosystem tools, GiveRadar focuses on a single thing: making registry-sourced charity research accessible at scale.

We aggregate data from 50+ official government regulators across 65+ countries: the IRS Exempt Organizations Master File and Form 990 e-files for the United States, the Charity Commission for England and Wales, ACNC for Australia, CRA for Canada, NGO Darpan from NITI Aayog for India, and dozens more. Every charity in the database receives an Integrity Assessment from 0 to 100 calculated automatically across registration status, financial transparency, organizational transparency, third-party validation, and community signals. We surface automated red flags (high executive pay, low program spending, missing filings, sanctions matches) and per-charity news context through GDELT integration.

The platform is free for browsing and offers a free public REST API at 100 requests per day, scaling to 99 USD per month for Pro and custom Enterprise pricing. Methodology and OpenAPI specification are published openly under CC-BY 4.0. We do not currently maintain a grants directory, jobs board, or events listings; our focus is research depth on the charity entities themselves.

Side-by-side comparison

Every comparison below is sourced from each platform's published documentation. Last reviewed June 2026.

Dimension	GiveRadar	NGOBase
Primary function	Free global charity research database	Multi-purpose NGO directory plus grants, jobs, events ecosystem
Data sourcing	Official government registries (50+ regulators across 65+ countries)	User submissions reviewed before publication
Geographic coverage	65+ countries	~8 main countries with strong coverage (India, Pakistan, US, Australia, Canada, Malaysia, NZ, Singapore); other countries listed but less developed
Records	7 million+ charities	~252,000 NGOs and charities
India coverage	Sourced from NGO Darpan (NITI Aayog official register)	Strong India and South Asia depth, with state-level and city-level breakdowns for many states
Per-charity scoring	Integrity Assessment 0-100 (5 components, automated)	No score; presents directory information for users to interpret
Red flags / news / sanctions	Yes (auto red flags + GDELT news + Open Sanctions screening)	No
Funding agencies / grants directory	No (focused on charity recipients, not funders)	Yes (Funding Agencies and Grantmakers Worldwide directory)
Jobs board	No	Yes (NGO sector job listings)
Events listings	No	Yes
Public API	REST + OpenAPI spec; free 100 req/day; Pro 99 USD/month	No public API documentation as of mid-2026
Pricing	Free web; free 100 req/day API; Pro 99 USD/month; transparent pricing	Free; supported by advertising and sector partnerships
Methodology published	Yes, openly under CC-BY 4.0 with full weight breakdown per scoring component	Submission and review process referenced; detailed methodology not publicly published

When to use which

Different audiences. The right choice depends on whether you are an NGO professional or a researcher.

Use NGOBase when

• You are an NGO professional looking for funding agencies, grants opportunities, or sector jobs
• Your research focuses on India or South Asia where NGOBase has deep state-level and city-level breakdowns
• You want NGO sector events listings or volunteer opportunities alongside the directory
• Your NGO wants to be discoverable through a user-submitted directory with active community contributions
• You appreciate the multi-purpose ecosystem framing that bundles directory + grants + jobs + events in one place

Use GiveRadar when

• You want every score input traceable to an official government regulator
• You need cross-border research across 65+ countries (vs NGOBase's strong-coverage list of about 8)
• An automatic Integrity Assessment, red flags, sanctions screening, or news context per charity matters to your research
• You need a programmatic REST API with public OpenAPI specification
• Your due diligence (journalism, grantmaking, academic research) requires verified registry-sourced data rather than user submissions
• You are working in countries NGOBase does not cover deeply (most of Europe, Latin America, Africa, much of Asia outside South Asia)

Use both when

You are doing research on India, Pakistan, or other South Asia NGO sectors. NGOBase's state-level and city-level breakdowns plus user-contributed organizational detail give you discovery breadth at a granular geographic level. GiveRadar's NGO Darpan-sourced India data plus our Integrity Assessment, red flag detection, and news context provide research-grade verification on top. Cross-checking both helps confirm the most reliable picture for charities operating in regions where NGOBase has invested heavily and where official registry data may be less comprehensively maintained than in OECD jurisdictions.

What we have in common

Despite different approaches, both platforms support nonprofit transparency and discovery.

Free for users

Browsing and searching is free on both platforms; no paywall on the directory or research interface.

Global mission

Both platforms exist to support international nonprofit discovery rather than focus narrowly on a single country.

Charity self-claim

NGOs can self-list (NGOBase) or claim and verify (GiveRadar) their own profile to ensure accurate representation.

Sector connection orientation

Both platforms are oriented toward making nonprofit ecosystem connections visible rather than treating individual organizations in isolation.

Honest about the limits

Where each platform falls short. Both have meaningful gaps relative to the other.

Where NGOBase is weaker than GiveRadar

• Geographic breadth: about 8 strong-coverage countries vs GiveRadar's 65+
• Data sourcing: user-submitted entries are reviewed but not registry-verified; GiveRadar's data is by definition government-registered
• No automated per-charity scoring, red flag detection, sanctions screening, or news context
• No public API or OpenAPI specification; programmatic research is not currently supported
• Methodology and verification process not publicly documented in detail
• Total record count of ~252,000 is a fraction of GiveRadar's 7 million+

Where GiveRadar is weaker than NGOBase

• No funding agencies / grants directory for NGO professionals seeking funding opportunities
• No NGO sector jobs board
• No events listings or volunteer opportunity feed
• India sub-national depth (state and city breakdowns) is less developed than NGOBase's curated India presence
• User-contributed organizational details that NGOBase's submission model captures may not appear in registry-sourced data
• NGOBase serves NGO professionals as an ecosystem; GiveRadar serves researchers as a database (different audiences, different surface area)

Registry-verified charity research

Search any of 7 million+ charities across 65+ countries, registry-sourced and free. Pair with NGOBase for grants, jobs, or India and South Asia sector ecosystem features.

Search charities How we score Data sources

Primary sources

All figures sourced from each platform's own published documentation. GiveRadar figures are live counts from this platform.

This page is written and maintained by GiveRadar. We make no claim to neutrality: we built GiveRadar and we believe in it. We have tried to represent NGOBase fairly. NGOBase is a thoughtful multi-purpose ecosystem platform with genuine strengths in India and South Asia plus features (grants, jobs, events) that we do not currently provide; we recommend it for those use cases. The two platforms answer different questions and combine well. If you spot an inaccuracy, email [email protected] and we will correct it.