Comparison
GiveRadar vs WikiCharities: an honest comparison
Two open nonprofit databases with very different philosophies. WikiCharities verifies through a 70-question self-reported profile and a Validation Seal, US-and-Canada-focused. GiveRadar verifies through 50+ official government registries across 65+ countries. Both are credible; the right one depends on your geography and your trust model.
GiveRadar in one paragraph
A free global charity research database launched in 2026. Aggregates 7 million+ charities from 50+ official government registries across 65+ countries. Computes an Integrity Assessment from 0 to 100 automatically from registry-filed data, no charity opt-in required. Surfaces red flags, sanctions matches, and per-charity news. Free public web interface; free REST API tier; Pro at 99 USD per month; methodology and OpenAPI spec published openly.
WikiCharities in one paragraph
A US 501(c)(3) public charity (EIN 90-0773724) founded in 2011 by Dr. Angie Holzer (originally as Given Tree, rebranded WikiCharities in 2016, web launch January 2021). Covers approximately 2.1 million US and Canadian nonprofits with free profile pages and a paid 70-question Validation Seal program (1 USD validation tier introduced April 2024). Co-publishes the Journal of Nonprofit Innovation with Brigham Young University. Latin America regional expansion launched January 2026.
The 30-second verdict
Use WikiCharities if your work is exclusively US or Canadian and you value voluntary self-disclosure narratives backed by a Validation Seal, plus academic-research integration through JoNI. Use GiveRadar if your work crosses borders, you want every score input traceable to an official government registry without depending on charity opt-in, or you need programmatic API access. Both platforms are credible; the difference comes down to geography and trust model.
Who they are
A bit of context on each platform before the side-by-side detail.
WikiCharities
WikiCharities was founded in 2011 by Dr. Angie Holzer, originally as "Given Tree" and rebranded as WikiCharities in 2016. The public web platform launched in January 2021 from Salt Lake City, Utah, growing out of Dr. Holzer's doctoral research on the challenges nonprofits face when trying to collaborate. The organization is itself a US 501(c)(3) public charity (EIN 90-0773724).
Every nonprofit registered in the United States or Canada has a free profile page on WikiCharities, sourced from the IRS BMF and the CRA charity register: approximately 2.1 million organizations as of mid-2023. Validation is the platform's distinctive feature: nonprofits complete a 70-question self-reported profile covering board of directors, contact information, financials, programs, and impact, earning a Validation Seal that signals transparency to donors and grantmakers. A 1 USD validation tier introduced in April 2024 makes the seal accessible to small organizations.
WikiCharities publishes the peer-reviewed Journal of Nonprofit Innovation (JoNI) in partnership with Brigham Young University, reaching readers in 154 countries. Other partnerships include Storyline Intelligence, Venturefy, and Ballard Brief. Latin America regional expansion launched in January 2026 with plans for additional regions.
GiveRadar
GiveRadar launched in 2026 as a free global charity research database. Rather than asking nonprofits to fill out a profile, GiveRadar aggregates the existing public registries that already track the nonprofit sector in every country: the IRS in the United States, the Charity Commission for England and Wales, the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission, the Canada Revenue Agency, France's RNA, Germany's BZSt, Brazil's Receita Federal, Japan's Hojin Bango, and 65+ country registries in total.
Every charity in the database receives an Integrity Assessment from 0 to 100 calculated automatically across five components: registration status, financial transparency, organizational transparency, third-party validation, and community signals. Charity opt-in is not required for the score. We surface automated red flags (high executive pay, low program spending, missing filings, sanctions matches) and per-charity news context through GDELT integration.
The platform is free for browsing and offers a free public REST API at 100 requests per day, scaling to 99 USD per month for Pro and custom Enterprise pricing. Methodology and OpenAPI specification are published openly under CC-BY 4.0. Charities can claim and edit their own GiveRadar profile after verification, but registry-sourced fields remain authoritative.
Side-by-side comparison
Every comparison below is sourced from each platform's own published documentation. Last reviewed June 2026.
| Dimension | GiveRadar | WikiCharities |
|---|---|---|
| Geographic coverage | 65+ countries; truly global | United States and Canada (Latin America launched Jan 2026; expanding) |
| Records covered | 7 million+ charities | ~2.1 million US and Canadian nonprofits |
| Verification model | Official government registry presence; automated Integrity Assessment 0-100 | Self-reported 70-question profile; Validation Seal awarded by WikiCharities |
| Charity opt-in required | No; every charity in the registries is scored automatically | Yes; Validation Seal requires the nonprofit to complete the 70-question profile |
| Pricing | Free public web; free API tier (100 req/day); Pro 99 USD/month | Free profile pages for all; paid Validation Seal subscription; 1 USD validation tier introduced April 2024 |
| Public API | REST + OpenAPI spec; self-service signup | No documented public API as of mid-2026 |
| Per-charity score | Integrity Assessment 0-100 (5 components, automated) | Validation Seal (binary: validated or not); no numeric score |
| Red flags / news context | Yes (auto red flags + GDELT news + Open Sanctions screening) | Not a primary feature; transparency emphasis is on disclosed profile |
| Donations processed | No; profile pages link to external donate pages | No direct processing; validated nonprofits can show direct PayPal links |
| Methodology published | Yes, openly under CC-BY 4.0 | Validation criteria documented (70 questions); platform-level policies published |
| Academic research output | No journal; methodology and data lineage published as documentation | Journal of Nonprofit Innovation (JoNI), peer-reviewed, partner with Brigham Young University |
| Founded | 2026 | 2011 (as Given Tree); rebranded WikiCharities 2016; web launch January 2021 |
| Founder | Matt Timmermans | Dr. Angie Holzer (CEO; doctorate in Organizational Learning and Leadership) |
| Legal status | Private platform (Timmermans Media OÜ, Estonia) | US 501(c)(3) public charity (EIN 90-0773724) |
When to use which
Both platforms are built with similar mission orientations. The right choice depends on geography, trust model, and integration needs.
Use WikiCharities when
- • Your research is exclusively US or Canadian and you value voluntary self-disclosure
- • You want a 70-question self-reported profile rather than registry-filed data
- • Your nonprofit wants to earn the Validation Seal as a transparency marker
- • You appreciate the academic-research dimension through JoNI
- • You want a searchable map view of nonprofits by location and topic
- • You support WikiCharities's mission and want to participate in their growing platform
Use GiveRadar when
- • Your research crosses borders or focuses on charities outside the United States and Canada
- • You want every input to the score traceable to a government regulator without requiring charity opt-in
- • You need a programmatic REST API with public OpenAPI specification
- • You want sanctions screening, news monitoring, and red flag detection per charity
- • A numeric Integrity Assessment is more useful than a binary validation seal for your decision-making
- • Your research extends to charities that have not opted in to a self-reported profile
Use both when
You are doing serious research on a US or Canadian charity. WikiCharities will tell you what the charity has chosen to disclose voluntarily through the 70-question profile (rich narrative depth where the seal exists). GiveRadar will tell you what the IRS or CRA has on file plus an automatic Integrity Assessment, red flags, and news context. Where the two agree, you have high confidence. Where the registry data and self-reported data diverge, you have a question worth asking before donating or granting.
What we have in common
Both platforms are openly mission-driven and share core principles about how nonprofit data should be accessible.
Open profile pages
Both platforms list every charity in their coverage with a free public-facing profile, regardless of whether the nonprofit has paid for premium features.
Charity self-claim
Verified nonprofits on either platform can claim and update their profile, adding richness to the registry-sourced or self-reported baseline.
Free for individual donors
Browsing, searching, and reading nonprofit profiles costs nothing on either platform; revenue comes from optional premium features.
Founder-led missions
Both platforms were started by founders with strong personal commitments to nonprofit transparency rather than as commercial spin-offs.
Honest about the limits
Where each platform falls short. We try to call out our own weaknesses as plainly as we call out anyone else's.
Where WikiCharities is weaker than GiveRadar
- • Geographic coverage is currently US and Canada with regional expansion underway; GiveRadar already covers 65+ countries
- • Validation Seal requires the nonprofit to opt in and complete a 70-question profile; unclaimed charities have no transparency signal beyond IRS recognition
- • No documented public API as of mid-2026; programmatic research is not currently supported
- • No automated red flag detection, sanctions screening, or news monitoring per charity
- • Validation is binary (seal or no seal) rather than a numeric score capturing degrees of transparency
Where GiveRadar is weaker than WikiCharities
- • WikiCharities has been operating since 2011 with an established Utah-based community and academic partnerships; GiveRadar is new (2026)
- • The Validation Seal program incentivizes nonprofits to actively maintain detailed profiles in a way registry data cannot match
- • The Journal of Nonprofit Innovation adds an academic-research dimension we do not have
- • Self-reported impact narratives, board demographics, and program-level descriptions are richer on a validated WikiCharities profile than on a GiveRadar profile sourced purely from registry data
- • WikiCharities is itself a US 501(c)(3); some institutional buyers prefer working with a fellow charity over a private platform
Search the world's charities
Search any of 7 million+ charities across 65+ countries, registry-sourced and free. Then verify against any other source you choose, including WikiCharities for US and Canadian self-disclosure narratives.
Primary sources
- WikiCharities: About
- WikiCharities: own profile page
- TechBuzz: WikiCharities builds global nonprofit database
- Great Companies: Interview with Dr. Angie Holzer
- Deseret News: WikiCharities aiming to elevate nonprofits
- University of Utah Lassonde: WikiCharities profile
All figures sourced from each platform's own published documentation. GiveRadar figures are live counts from this platform.
This page is written and maintained by GiveRadar. We make no claim to neutrality: we built GiveRadar and we believe in it. We have tried to represent WikiCharities fairly. WikiCharities is a thoughtful platform built on real academic research into nonprofit collaboration, with a clear mission to elevate nonprofit transparency. The two platforms have similar values and overlap meaningfully; this page exists to help donors and grantmakers choose the right tool for their geography and trust model. If you spot an inaccuracy, email [email protected] and we will correct it.