PublicationEdition 1 · August 2026

Global Charity Register Transparency Index 2026

How open are the world's official charity registers? This index scores 76 countries on seven dimensions, from whether a public register exists at all to whether it publishes financial filings and board data in machine readable form. It scores governments and their register infrastructure. It never scores charities.

By Matt Timmermans ORCID 0009-0004-8212-8186 CC-BY-4.0
Report + dataset (DOI) View on Zenodo

Key findings

6 countries at 100/100

Australia, Estonia, Ireland, Latvia, New Zealand, and the United States. All share free search, bulk open data, published financial filings, and published governance data. Canada misses by one point at 98.

Wealth does not predict openness

Latvia and Estonia score 100 while Germany scores 49: its national register has no export, no financial data, and no officer data. Austria scores 39 and Spain 38.

The MENA surprise

Jordan (59), Egypt (56), Saudi Arabia (54), and Morocco (42) all outscore Germany. Their registers refuse foreign connections but are information rich inside: Egypt's returns registration numbers for 36,559 organizations, and Saudi Arabia publishes per-organization governance scores.

13 registers publish nothing

In 13 countries scoring under 20, registration runs through a ministry or official gazette and the public sees nothing. The score reflects government data policy, never the charities of that country. Five more countries could not be assessed at all: their official infrastructure is unreachable from any network route.

The ranking

76 countries · assessed 2026-08-05
RankCountryScoreBand
1Australia100Open-register leader
2Estonia100Open-register leader
3Ireland100Open-register leader
4Latvia100Open-register leader
5New Zealand100Open-register leader
6United States100Open-register leader
7Canada98Open-register leader
8Czech Republic94Open-register leader
9Denmark94Open-register leader
10Israel94Open-register leader
11Norway94Open-register leader
12United Kingdom92Open-register leader
13Romania90Open-register leader
14Russia89Open-register leader
15Italy86Open-register leader
16France84Open-register leader
17Belgium83Open-register leader
18Poland83Open-register leader
19Croatia81Open-register leader
20Japan81Open-register leader
21Argentina78Strong
22Serbia75Strong
23Mexico74Strong
24Jersey73Strong
25Netherlands73Strong
26Ukraine73Strong
27Colombia70Strong
28Hungary70Strong
29South Korea68Strong
30Switzerland66Strong
31Brazil65Strong
32Isle of Man60Strong
33Jordan59Partial
34Bahrain58Partial
35Egypt56Partial
36Sweden56Partial
37Ghana54Partial
38Saudi Arabia54Partial
39Thailand54Partial
40Finland53Partial
41Kenya52Partial
42Germany49Partial
43Palestine49Partial
44Qatar49Partial
45Portugal46Partial
46Tanzania46Partial
47Tunisia46Partial
48Bangladesh45Partial
49Peru45Partial
50India43Partial
51Nigeria43Partial
52Philippines43Partial
53Chile42Partial
54Morocco42Partial
55United Arab Emirates41Partial
56Austria39Limited
57Sierra Leone39Limited
58Malaysia38Limited
59Spain38Limited
60Oman34Limited
61South Africa31Limited
62Indonesia30Limited
63Turkey26Limited
64Namibia19Closed
65Mauritania8Closed
66Comoros6Closed
67Algeria3Closed
68Democratic Republic of the Congo3Closed
69Sudan3Closed
70Cambodia0Closed
71Djibouti0Closed
72Lebanon0Closed
73Lesotho0Closed
74Somalia0Closed
75Syria0Closed
76Vietnam0Closed

Not ranked: Nepal (assessed on six of seven dimensions; its register site was offline throughout the assessment window, even from in-country network access) and Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, and Yemen (official infrastructure unreachable from every network route tried). A country is ranked only when all seven dimensions carry a verified official source.

How it is scored

Seven dimensions, fixed anchors, 100 points. Every scored cell carries an official source URL and a retrieval date. Nearly every cell can be re-verified at that URL in minutes; for registers that refuse international connections, the Zenodo deposit includes retrieval-dated captured evidence. Research was performed by AI research agents under the published methodology, with an independent audit and human editorial control; a country is ranked only when all seven dimensions are verified.

DimensionWeightWhat it measures
Register existence and scope0-20Does a public register exist, and how much of the sector does it cover
Public accessibility0-15Can anyone search it, free, without an account
Machine readability0-20Bulk download, API, structured export, or nothing machine readable
Identifier system0-10Does every organization have a documented public identifier
Financial disclosure0-20What the register itself publishes, not what charities disclose elsewhere
Governance data0-10Are officers, trustees, or board members published
Currency and cadence0-5How often the public data is refreshed
Cite this work

Timmermans, M. (2026). Global Charity Register Transparency Index 2026, Edition 1. GiveRadar. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21804904

Report, dataset, methodology, independent audit findings, and evidence pack are published under CC-BY-4.0 at the DOI above. GiveRadar intends to run this index annually.